Hi,

I'm using cuteeditor for a client and convinced him to use this component. It worked great until now.

I need to generate multilpe editors in a page and since I use the editor in a code fragment that expects pure html it seems I am in trouble. I expected I could just use the RenderControl property as with other controls.

This person had the same problem and he illustrates the standard solution in his last post :
http://cutesoft.net/forums/3324/ShowPost.aspx

 

I can't seem to use use this editor in a simple form tag (not a runat=server) without specifying the <CE:Editor>

I saw that the classic asp version has a Draw() method that outputs the html.

I hope I can present my client a solutin soon since I got a dealine tomorrow

Can you tell me why you want to use the editor without specifying the <CE:Editor>?

The CuteEditor for .NET is developered as an ASP.NET server control.

To use this, CuteEditor must be included in a Web Forms page using a Register directive:

<%@ Register TagPrefix="CE" Namespace="CuteEditor" Assembly="CuteEditor" %>

After registering the control, you need to place the control tag in the Web Forms page (including the runat="server" attribute):

<CE:Editor id="Editor1" runat="server" ></CE:Editor>


      

 

 

 

My client want's to integrate the editor in his backoffice.

The backoffice is a generic piece of code that reads the table structures of a database and generates update,create & delete forms.

I have to replace the textarea's with the editor.

So I have to cut in where this generic piece of code decides to ouput the texterea and make it an editor instead.

The code builds a long string of input elements and I have to append the editor as pure html

 

The page doesn't use a <form runat=server> either. It's a simple <form>

If I could use the RenderControl Method it would open up this editor for me in other projects too... and I love the what I have seen until now so please support it. I have already bought it for my client and I want to use it in other projects too.
Table manipulation realy stands out if you compare it with other editors.


Could you maybe provide me with a workaround for the moment? I tried to save the generated html and put it into string.
But than I noticed you scramble the ouput of the editor a bit and expect the editor to present the data. I was hoping I could just use request["var"]. But this is all very hacky and not a good solution.

tom