then its not a "pastetext" function at all.

my users need to paste clean text (no html), which is what "pastetext" is supposed to do (there is already a pastCleanHtml).

so now they must use the code-cleaner which is extra steps, and not obvious to new users.

so shouldnt the "pastetext" do what it's definition dictates and what the code-cleaner already does?
afterall, paste-text means pasting "text", not "html" or "part-html".

additionally, it still allows other html elements like hyperlinks, which is a HUGE mistake considering this is supposed to be "plaintext", not html.