Adam, with all due respect, I do not plan on installing version 6.0, since you have had to update it so frequently.  I think that you are asking too much from your customers.  I should not have to check your website every week to see if you put a new version up.  My impression is that 6.0 was a buggy release, which is why you have had to update it so frequently.  If 6.1 is going to be updated as frequently as 6.0, I will no longer use CuteEditor as a component in my software.  I will find a new rich text editor, one that follows a reasonable update schedule.

You have not answered my second question.  What I want to know is this - will 6.1 be updated as frequently as 6.0 has been?

As for your resistance to version numbers - yes, I understand that you have reasons for not using them.  However, I ask that you please take a look around you at what other companies do.  You will realize that nearly all of them use version numbers.  This is the industry standard, and is considered a best practice.  Thus, it is not unreasonable for me to ask that you do the same.

I understand that you want to accommodate customers that use an old version of the framework.  However, if you didn't publish an update to your software every few days or so, this wouldn't be a problem.  Your customers would update their DLLs once every few months, and that would be the end of it.